The blog for the Institute of Modern Languages Research
Liberty, Irreverence and the Place of Women in Early Modern Italian Culture: a one-day Symposium in Honour of Letizia Panizza
Simone Testa reports:
The event that took place at the Institute of Modern Languages Research, University of London, on 11 May 2018 celebrated a scholar whose research has always been marked by a strong multi-disciplinary character, Letizia Panizza. Participants from Europe, North America and Britain formed a very stimulating group of speakers and audience of three generations of scholars who were Letizia Panizza’s long-time friends and colleagues, and the first and second generation inspired by Panizza’s research interests.
The image on the conference poster represents the emblem of one of the Academies dear to Letizia Panizza, the Incogniti of Venice. It shows a mountain and a river, possibly the river Nile, with the motto ‘ex ignoto, notus’ (known from the unknown). As organisers, we thought that this emblem was applicable also to Letizia Panizza’s scholarly mission, not only because of her interest in the group of writers known as the Incogniti. The emblem also describes Letizia’s approaches to research, her deep knowledge of and commitment to understanding the true meaning of texts, and the scholarly background that has characterised her contributions.
Jane Everson, a long-time colleague of Letizia Panizza, and Stefano Jossa, a senior lecturer at Royal Holloway, opened the day. Everson recounted when Panizza organised two very successful events almost single-handedly, one on Renaissance Women, and another on Libertines. Jossa paid tribute to Panizza’s generosity in also sharing her knowledge through convivial moments, very much in the footsteps of the classical tradition of which she is a renowned scholar.
Letizia Panizza herself set the friendly and scholarly tone of the Symposium when she addressed Stephen Clucas, her former PhD student, just before he started his tribute, by saying: “Remember, Stephen, I know that an encomium is meant to be full of lies!” In his remarks, Clucas underlined the breadth and depth of Panizza’s contributions to scholarship: her early interests in Lorenzo Valla and humanism; the lives of Renaissance philosophers; and her groundbreaking commitment to give a voice to Early-Modern women. Within this very broad frame, Panizza has explored all sorts of discourses and literary genra: satire, poetry, political treatises, polemical arguments and philosophical debates.
The Space of Women in Early Modern Italy could take the shape of the intimacy of domestic piety (Abigail Brundin) or the literary efforts of a mother who wrote behavioural instructions to her daughter. As for spaces strictu sensu, Sandra Cavallo illustrated how the rooms of a palace, designed to host the family of Cardinal Spada in Rome, included spaces for women, which were surprisingly more subject to intrusion by males than male rooms, despite the narrative of the protection of women’s honour in those centuries.
The panel on poetry offered a variety of topics, spanning from Alison Brown’s new research on thus-far neglected poems by Piero de’ Medici the Unfortunate. Brown commented on the network of people surrounding Piero, including Poliziano, who was among the first readers of Piero’s poetry. Amelia Papworth explained the contradictory attitude of the poetess Laura Terracina towards a giant of Italian literature such as Ariosto. Still on Ariosto’s circulation, Ambra Anelotti illustrated the literary adaptation of the poet’s characters in the epistolary genre, in the decades between the end of the sixteenth century and middle of the seventeenth.
The roles of individuals were the focus of Unn Irene Aasdalene’s paper, which illustrated the way in which the part of the female protagonist Diotima, in Plato’s Symposium, was then used and refashioned in Ficino’s dialogue De amore. John Sellars argued that the fashion of writing philosophers’ lives in Renaissance culture matched the widespread fascination with conceiving philosophy as a way of life. Michael Allen closed the panel with reflections on Platonic ideas.
In the last panel, Marta Fattori illustrated a case study of censorship of Machiavelli in eighteenth-century Rome, where a Master of the Sacred Palace aptly defined the Florentine Secretary as an author of ambiguous faith, whose work either enthused readers or made them utterly condemn his theories. Dilwyn Knox referred to Panizza’s interest in Giordano Bruno and his Spaccio de la bestia trionfante, proposing that Bruno’s recurring maxim ‘Nature is God in Things’ was actually an expression of the coherence of his philosophy. Finally, there was a return to Panizza’s interest in the voices of Early Modern Italian women. Francesca Medioli discussed her own detailed historical research into Tarabotti’s life during the years between her taking the veil, and her connection with the prince of the Incogniti academy GiovanFrancesco Loredan.
Finally, Stephen Clucas thanked several people and institutions for their help at various stages in the organisation of the successful event emphasising the importance of Panizza’s contributions, and which attracted a large audience and saw lively debates at the end of each panel. Many thanks to the generous sponsorship of four institutions: the Society of Italian Studies; the Society for Renaissance Studies; The University of Cambridge; and Royal Holloway University of London.
Organisers: Simone Testa, Stephen Clucas, Stefano Jossa, Abigail Brundin, Susan Haskins and Chiara Bechis.
Simone Testa, International Studies Institute, Florence
Naomi Wells reports on the British Academy plenary round table hosted at the ‘Uncommon Ground: Modern Languages and Cultures for the 21st Century’ conference held at Durham University on 16-18 April 2018
Last month, Durham’s School of Modern Languages and Cultures hosted a conference aimed at addressing ‘the pressing ethical imperatives for the study of Modern Languages and Cultures as a diverse and yet coherent discipline in a world which is increasingly – and acrimoniously – divided’. The landmark conference was also intended to act as a platform for establishing a regular UK-based gathering of the Modern Languages research community to promote the productive exchange of ideas across language and subject boundaries. Central to the conference’s vision for the future direction of the discipline, as articulated by Durham’s Head of School Janet Stewart, was the idea not of promoting uniformity but rather of highlighting a commitment to recognising but not reifying disciplinary diversity.
The closing panel of the conference, sponsored by the British Academy and chaired by Nigel Vincent, addressed more directly the ongoing questions and debates surrounding the disciplinary identity of Modern Languages. Speakers were drawn from across languages and institutions to share their experiences and reflections on the definition of Modern Languages as a discipline. Neil Kenny (Oxford), Lead Fellow for Languages at the British Academy, opened the panel with his own working definition: ‘The study of languages and of their associated cultures and societies from simultaneously the inside and the outside’. Kenny foregrounded the interaction of the insider and outsider perspectives as central to our approach and analysis in Modern Languages, thus emphasising the importance of a heightened awareness both of our ‘embodied’ immersion in the languages we study and of our linguistic, cultural and/or geographical mooring in the UK.
Jonathan Long (Durham) equally emphasised the need for a broad and inclusive definition for Modern Languages, explaining how no discipline is required to agree on a single shared methodology or object of study. Instead, Long emphasised that what holds us together are the shared practices of knowledge exchange, for example through subject associations and conferences such as this. Paul Starkey (Durham) followed by offering distinct definitions of ‘a discipline’, contrasting the definition based on shared faculties, subject associations and journals, with the idea of a discipline as a form of authority imposed through rigorous training and potentially elements of ‘policing’ of disciplinary boundaries. Starkey also highlighted the Eurocentrism common to definitions of Modern Languages in the UK, with Arabic, his own language of specialisation, until recently located elsewhere in Oriental or Area Studies departments.
Michelle MacLeod (Aberdeen) drew attention to Gaelic and other Celtic languages which equally often lack prominence in Modern Languages discussions. MacLeod explained how the minoritised status of these languages had meant significant funds were now available for language policy related research, but this needed to be balanced in the curriculum with more traditional areas of study such as literature. Gerda Wielander (Westminster) also highlighted the connections between the study of Chinese and political priorities, clarifying the distinction between Area or China Studies, where the language was often considered marginal, and Chinese Studies, where language learning and knowledge is central.
Wielander highlighted differing institutional definitions of Modern Languages, drawing on her own experiences in a post-92 university setting. Despite these differences, she emphasised the value and importance of sharing resources and skills across Modern Languages, and of a shared disciplinary identity to guard against the threat of being easily subsumed under other disciplines. Closing the panel, Charles Forsdick echoed the importance of external visibility and internal credibility for Modern Languages as a discipline, drawing attention to the risk of performing our disciplinary diversity as fragmentation. He also stressed the importance of developing a stronger sense of our disciplinary history beyond a focus only on contemporary events, mentioning the 1918 Leathes Report and Nicola McLelland’s work on the history of Modern Languages teaching in the UK. Bringing us back to Kenny’s proposed definition, Forsdick drew on the work of Mary Louise Pratt to highlight that central to Modern Languages research and teaching is the idea of ‘knowing languages and knowing the world through language’.
In sum, while the panel offered very distinct perspectives from across a range of languages, experiences and institutions, there was a shared emphasis on the value of articulating and communicating our disciplinary identity. Equally, the breadth of subjects covered and productive discussions held across the plenary sessions and panels I attended over the three days of the conference served to highlight the vibrancy and value of the work and debates which take place in the ‘uncommon ground’ across which Modern Languages scholars teach and research.
Naomi Wells, Post-Doctoral Research Associate (Translingual Communities, European Languages and Digital Humanities), IMLR
The starting point for my research work at the IMLR in February/March this year was a major project of what was formerly the London Research Group for German Exile Studies and is now the Research Centre for German and Austrian Exile Studies (RCGAES): “Changing countries. The experience and achievement of German-speaking Exiles from Hitler in Britain from 1933 to today” (henceforward CC). This is the title of a book presented in 2002 produced by eight researchers (in alphabetical order): Marietta Bearman, Charmian Brinson, Anthony Grenville, Stefan Howald, Marian Malet, Jennifer Taylor, Irene Wells and Erna Woodgate). The book was the result of a study in Oral History based on 34 interviews with former refugees from Nazism living at the time of the interviews in the UK, belonging mainly to German-speaking families. These interviews were conducted from 1994 with the aim of preserving personal memories, analysing them and making them available for future research. This study has been, and still is, an inspiration for my own research, which is similarly based on a corpus of interviews with German-speaking refugees (mainly gathered during a Visiting Fellowship at Clare Hall Cambridge in 2017). Although the two interview corpora – that of “Changing countries” and mine – have much in common, my research aims in regard to the interviews are in fact quite different from those of the original CC project. Whereas their main aim seems to have been to establish the historical record, mine is much narrower and is firmly centred on the linguistic and cultural side of the experiences of the refugees. Apart from this, there are significant differences in the interviews themselves: my interviews were overwhelmingly done in German (whereas those of CC had been mainly in English. In addition, the interviewees in my project only partially overlap in terms of age with those of CC, mine being in many cases a generation younger).
During my stay at the RCGAES I started to analyse the 34 recorded and transcribed interviews available in the Archives of the Senate House Library. What I principally want to understand from my research is how linguistic repertoires are formed and how language/s have influenced the trajectory of the speakers’ lives and relationships within changing social contexts. From a methodological point of view, my research is based on the analysis of language biographies (cfr. Pavlenko 2007, Busch 2013/2017, Stevenson 2017).
Language biographies constitute one of the biographical approaches in multilingualism research and within this area there are in fact considerable differences in theoretical and methodological foundations. What language biographies most often consist of are accounts of an individual’s language development across their lifespan (Franceschini 2010) and include aspects such as language learning or the acquisition processes, the linguistic strategies which speakers use in different situations and the attitudes associated with these strategies. Thinking and speaking about one’s linguistic development or “upbringing” can help people to identify the role that different languages or different varieties have played in various stages of their lives; it can lead them to identify crucial events that have influenced their attitudes, as well as people who might have had a great influence on their attitudes to the languages and speech communities they are in contact with. Different studies in the language biographies tradition have employed different research designs (cfr. Krumm 2013, König 2014, et al.); some of them are based on live history research and narrative analysis and have shown how individuals continue to be aware of their heritage languages and see them as part of their identity (cfr. Betten 2010, Leonardi/Thüne/Betten 2016). This perception of linguistic continuity is very important because it helps to compensate for actual discontinuities in one’s personal biography (e.g. a change of location), which leave their traces in one’s memory in the same way as socio-political discontinuities (e.g. regime change). Perceived linguistic continuity may exist even where the heritage language has acquired problematic cultural and political associations. From this point of view the “lived experience of language/Spracherleben” (cfr. Busch 2017) is a key element in language biographies. The interviews of the Research Centre present a rich and multifaceted basis to focus these aspects.
Professor Eva-Maria Thüne, University of Bologna/Miller Visiting Fellow
When I received an email from Hüseyin Tabak on Wednesday 7 March with the message ‘ich bin gleich in Swansea. Es hat alles super geklappt’ I was finally persuaded that the already famous young film director was really coming!
Plans for Hüseyin’s visit, which would see him work with numerous audiences from schools, universities and the wider public over three intensive days of activities, were first hatched the previous summer. Anna Saunders (Bangor University), the co-director of the Think German Wales network we founded together with assistance of the Embassy in July 2014, was enthusiastic. Having decided to extend an invitation to the man responsible for the film Das Pferd auf dem Balkon, which has proved so popular on the new WJEC AS and A level syllabus, the first challenge was to find his email address. I asked fellow film director Andreas Dresen, a Think German Wales guest in November 2014, but he could not tell us. At my request Professor Erica Carter (King’s College London) sent a message around the German Studies Screen Network. Soon a reply came in and it was positive. The German Embassy agreed to help cover his fee and expenses, supportive of the German Networks which the Cultural Attaché helped establish three years ago.
Pinning such a busy guest down to a date which suits all soon proved harder than tracking him down or securing the external funding. Hüseyin was busy in the editing studio – getting ready a new film about a female boxer called Gypsy Queen for release in the autumn of 2018. At Swansea’s Dylan Thomas Birthplace on the second evening in Swansea a select audience would be privileged to view some excerpts from a rough cut of this film. It is about Roma culture, which Hüseyin explained has interested him as a Kurd for many years, and not just because of the two peoples’ shared status as stateless nations. It is based around the story of a woman who boxes and is an outsider in contemporary Germany. It begins with a dramatic scene of the central character giving birth, apparently with no assistance except from her four-year old child whom she locks in another room. As in his other work to date, multilingualism appears to be at the heart of her life and experience of overlapping worlds.
By the beginning of December 2017, Anna Saunders, Hüseyin and I had finalised a date at the beginning of the following March. I informed German teachers in South Wales and received a number of excited responses from those teaching Das Pferd auf dem Balkon, from Porthcawl Comprehensive, Whitchurch High School in Cardiff, and all the way from Crickhowell on the Heads of the Valleys Road, requesting details and timings and expressing plans to come to Swansea to attend a workshop. I then wrote to the Embassy to say that we were ready to fill out the formal application form for funding, as previously discussed. A couple of days later a response came back, explaining that because no government was in place in Berlin, the September elections having resulted in an unusual stalemate, they were under instructions not to agree to fund new projects. This was a blow. We were expecting a free-lance artist to give up four days of his professional time and were planning to make him work hard traveling around Wales, from Swansea to Bangor. External support was critical. Then, just before Christmas (like in Das Pferd auf dem Balkon which ends with a Christmas miracle), I was at a meeting at the IMLR and heard that there were funds for projects taking place outside London. The rest, as they say, is history.
By mid-January we were in a position to plan the schedule. Cinema & Co on Swansea High Street, a new venue which is part of a regeneration programme affecting the city centre, were delighted to screen the film Deine Schönheit ist nichts wert on the first evening of Hüseyin’s visit. This is a more challenging film than Das Pferd auf dem Balkon, which was made with children in mind. It is mainly in Turkish (with German sub-titles) and is about a family of Turkish-Kurdish asylum seekers in Vienna and in particular the role of interpreters and translators in the life of a displaced family. Vessel, the twelve-year old boy at the centre of the film, is required to recite a German poem to his class and endeavours to get his favourite poem by the Kurdish poet who he is named after translated into German. He also wants to impress a female class-mate whom he takes to be Austrian but whose family in fact fled the war in Bosnia half a generation ago. My immediate problem was that the DVD had no English sub-titles and in order to understand the film you needed either Turkish (for 80% of the dialogue) or German (for the rest of the dialogue and the sub-titles). My first misjudgement was to assume that because a DVD has no sub-titles, subtitled versions of the film do not exist. ‘Always ask the film-maker’, Hüseyin advised me when he got to Swansea. ‘We always have other versions of films’ – in this case there are subtitles in various languages, including English.
We publicised the screening and were delighted with an audience of nearly 40, from the local Turkish and Kurdish communities, the city of Swansea, Swansea and Cardiff Universities and many other places. The film was well received and the discussion with Hüseyin went on for more than half an hour. He spoke excellent English, as well as German and Turkish. He told us about how the events depicted in the film, including the deportation of the Bosnian family, were based on reality. He explained how he came to study cinema under Michael Haneke at the Filmakademie in Vienna. Haneke commented on his films during the post-production phase and he took his advice very seriously. He still intends one day to finish his Masters after many delays. The discussion predictably turned to politics. The situation in Kurdistan is evolving all the time, but currently the Kurds were getting hit from all sides, especially Turkey. In Austria, which he described (as a German) as a slightly strange country, there had always been a right-wing presence and he could notice how people reacted to his appearance. Growing up in Ostwestfalen in Germany, where his parents worked in a factory, he had never noticed such looks, though he had friends who reported differently. This all changed with the Migrant Crisis of 2015, when suddenly he was taken to be a foreigner, a refugee, an undeserving alien. He predicted in conversation later that many of the migrants who came to Germany since the summer of 2015 would face the same fate as the Bosnian family in his first feature film, settling in Germany with their families, living there for years, only to be ‘sent back’ a decade or more later. He explained how his role models were Charlie Chaplin and Yilmaz Guney, the legendary Kurdish director who won a Palme D’Or at Cannes in the early 1980s. He credited both Chaplin and Guney at the end of all his films. Guney is the subject of his next film, a documentary which took him some seven years to research and make, entitled The Legend of the King. It was premiered at the Toronto Film Festival and is due to open the Kurdish Film Festival in London on 13 April 2018 and screened again at the East End Festival a month later. Hüseyin’s first long film was also a documentary on the subject of the ‘Homeless Word Cup’, featuring a team made up of vulnerable young men from a variety backgrounds who represented Austria at the 2008 tournament in Australia.
The first evening was a success. The next morning we were expecting just over 20 sixth-formers from three different schools to descend on the Swansea campus in the newly refurbished Talisien Arts Centre to hear about the film they were studying for A or AS level, Das Pferd auf dem Balkon. They were from Porthcawl, Stanwell in Cardiff and Ystalyvera in the Swansea Valley, a Welsh-medium school. I prepared them for a Q&A with Hüseyin, followed by showing them extracts from the film which he commented on. The students and their teachers were very attentive and prepared some unexpected questions: what happened to the horse? Which character would you leave out if you had to leave one out? They spoke and listened to German for three hours, their concentration levels barely dipping. There is a film of an interview which I recorded with Hüseyin later in the day which recapitulates much of the morning’s conversation. It can be found on the Think German Wales website
After talking non-stop for two hours, Hüseyin returned to his hotel. His mind was on other projects and he needed time with his lap-top. He turned up again a little late for a screening of Das Pferd auf dem Balkon to university students and colleagues. This was not so well attended, but appreciated nonetheless by those who were there. Hüseyin later expressed some disquiet at the venue for a screening, which only opened the previous week, because the architects had designed it so that people can wander in and out or at least take a peek at what was going on in the performance space.
With colleagues Ute and Christiane and a Jeremy, a postgraduate student, we hurried to a meal before heading to the Dylan Thomas Birthplace for a final public conversation. I was also planning to show clips from his three films to appear on DVD to date which I had prepared earlier in the week and sent on to Geoff Hayden who owns and runs the Birthplace as a tourist attraction and mini cultural centre. The evening was a sell-out, albeit the venue has a capacity of 25. First the two of us were interviewed by Swansea Bay TV, who broadcast the result twice the following Sunday morning. Hüseyin then reacted to prompts from me and the clips, which he had not previously seen, discussing animatedly with members of the audience who were not slow to express comments. Whereas for me the highlight of the visit was undoubtedly the workshop with the sixth-formers and their teachers, this is the occasion, in Swansea at least, which he found the most rewarding. After a break he suggested that he show us extracts from Gypsy Queen which his editor in Germany emailed to him. He wanted to test reactions and the audience stayed in their seats until nearly 10.30 pm, aware that they were taking part in a very rare moment: sitting in the former sitting room of the Anglo-Welsh poet listening to a Kurdish-Turkish-German film director explain his latest work. Dylan Thomas’s father had famously not spoken Welsh with his son because like so many Welsh-speaking parents he wanted his son to get on in the world and saw Welsh as a hindrance. Hüseyin was interested in the role of the Welsh language in contemporary Swansea, noticing the bilingual signs on his arrival. He told us how his father was fluent in Kurdish because he grew up in a village, whereas his mother spoke very little because she came from a town where Kurds were frightened to speak their own language. Consequently, he himself did not speak much Kurdish. We were on the subject of politics again and he told us about having been interviewed by police in the middle of the night on a recent visit to Turkey and how an uncle who has the same name had been hauled in to a police station and asked questions about film-making. His mistake on his last visit was to show his Turkish passport at the hotel, rather than his German one. He was determined to return and not show fear, but the audience warned him to be careful.
We finished the evening in a state of some satisfaction at a day well spent and agreed to meet the following morning in time to set off by car for Bangor. We set off at 9.45 am but the trek north took longer than anticipated, so we arrived in Bangor too late for a planned seminar at 3pm.
Professor Julian Preece, Chair in German, Swansea University
Hüseyin and Julian were clearly both relieved to arrive in Bangor after the long drive north and Hüseyin was understandably frustrated that one of our planned events couldn’t take place: a seminar with students on careers in the creative industries in Germany and Austria. However, students who missed this event came to the evening film showing and were able to engage with Hüseyin both during the Q&A and afterwards and thus still benefit from his expertise.
In the afternoon, we were pleased to welcome 17 pupils and teachers from three schools in North Wales: Ysgol David Hughes (Menai Bridge), Ysgol Eirias (Colwyn Bay) and Emrys Ap Iwan (Abergele), who attended a workshop with Stefanie Kreibich, a postgraduate student at Bangor. The pupils and teachers were excited at the prospect of hearing Hüseyin speak about Das Pferd auf dem Balkon later in the day and were enthusiastic about the event as a whole. Given that there are very few published materials on the film, this was an extremely valuable opportunity to explore the film in detail and gain insight into the directors’ motivations, as well as hear about the production process. During the workshop pupils also prepared questions to ask Hüseyin during the Q&A.
The last event of the three days was a public screening of Das Pferd auf dem Balkon in the cinema in Pontio, Bangor University’s new high-profile arts and innovation centre. This was Hüseyin’s favourite venue and the best attended of all the events, attracting school pupils, university students and members of the public from academic and non-academic backgrounds. With the help of the Cinema Manager, Emyr Williams, we introduced Hüseyin tri-lingually in Welsh, German and English before the film began, and enjoyed an animated Q&A session after the film. Audience members were eager to find out more about Hüseyin’s work with young and often inexperienced actors, in particular Enzo Gaier, whose portrayal of a 10 year-old boy with Asperger’s had clearly moved many – some with personal experience. Others quizzed Hüseyin on his career path, and were interested to learn how much he still values his very early experiences of working on set as a general dogsbody. For him, these experiences remain central to shaping the way he works with his team and relates to his actors. The discussion also touched on Hüseyin’s role models and inspiration, his present and future projects, and the importance of storytelling. The evening proved inspiring for budding filmmakers and German enthusiasts alike, as well as for those with personal experiences of Asperger’s and the issues raised in the film. It was, in brief, a resounding success, and we are very grateful to the IMLR, as well as the Universities of Swansea and Bangor, for making this possible.
Dr Anna Saunders, Head of School of Modern Languages, Bangor University | Senior Lecturer in German
Enthusiastic participants braved the wintry weather on 1 March to discuss some of the intriguing issues arising from the concept of translingualism at a symposium convened by Dr Godela Weiss-Sussex at the IMLR. Part of the AHRC-funded Open World Research Initiative project ‘Cross-Language Dynamics – Reshaping Community’, this event was designed to test ideas for a major international conference next year on women’s translingual writing.
What is translingualism? Although Prof Anne Fleig (FU Berlin) commented wryly at the end of the afternoon that there is actually no equivalent word in German, the definition that emerged was that of a vector, a moving between and across languages, a process showing elements of more than one language and operating from within its own uncertainties. As Dr Weiss-Sussex explained, translingualism is not new, since it is a common exile experience, but in our times, in which migration and multilingualism are more commonplace experiences, translingual language use is often a choice, not a necessity. Rather than being seen as defective, moving beyond the monolingual paradigm provides an opportunity to express complex hybrid identities – or to resist expectations of identitarian discourse altogether.
Focusing on the detailed analysis of texts in French, Italian and German, the symposium presenters considered how various writers used specific language-enriching strategies and techniques in their translingual texts. Specifically, the questions addressed in this workshop were:
• How does the particular attention to language required in translingual writing affect the text?
• What are the distinctive literary and linguistic strategies employed in translingual writing?
• Does writing in a foreign tongue go hand in hand with establishing a new identity?
• What can translingual writing achieve that goes beyond the possibilities of texts produced by mother-tongue writers?
• What is the relationship between translingual expression and femininity?
First, participating via a Skype link, Prof Mary Gallagher (University College Dublin) examined the novelist and essayist Nancy Huston’s writing in French (a language she learned as a teenager), as well as her self-translations back into her ‘mother tongue’, English. She explored how Huston’s linguistic decisions (influenced by the childhood trauma of separation from her mother) helped to construct and define her identity as a writer, a woman and a mother herself. Prof Gallagher stressed Huston’s awareness of the empowering capacity to ‘superimpose’ different identities on one another through the use of different languages. However, she also highlighted Huston’s strong and complex connection with her ‘langue mère’, English, which continues to be a point of origin and reference for Huston’s identities as a daughter and a mother.
Anne Fleig, by contrast, started her observations by sharply critiquing the concept of the mother tongue as a construct used in the service of nation building and the normalisation of monolingualism. Referring to the German language context specifically, Prof Fleig traced how, building on the ‘naturalising’ rhetoric of authenticity, a standardisation of language could be enforced in the late 19th century that is now being questioned and undermined in recent translingual writing, primarily by women. Analysing heteroglossia in the writings of Emine Sevgi Özdamar and Yoko Tawada – authors, respectively, of Turkish and Japanese origin who have achieved considerable literary success writing in German – Fleig highlighted the process of emancipation of the female voice in translingual texts and commented on the similarities between the experiences of women and migrant writers more generally.
One of the strategies Fleig highlighted in Özdamar’s and Tawada’s writing is that of ‘queering’ the mother tongue through a polyphonic, dialogical writing style. Polyphonic writing is a characteristic also of the texts by the Somalia-born author Shirin Ramzanali Fazel. In her paper on Fazel’s novel Nuvole sull’Equatore, Dr Maria Cristina Seccia (Hull) showed how untranslated Somali words and sentences in the narrative are placed in dialogue with rather than in opposition to Italian, thus making Somali culture visible served as a form of resistance to the imposition of monolingualism, and to the amnesia about the colonial policy of deliberate neglect of mixed-race Italians.
In discussing Katja Petrowskaja’s search for a sense of belonging through the imaginative re-creation of her family’s pre-Holocaust history in Vielleicht Esther (published in German in 2014 and in English translation in January this year), Godela Weiss-Sussex emphasised the author’s embrace of ambiguity and incoherencies stemming from the unreliability of fragmentary memories in the construction of a narrative that acts as a powerful tool in reworking and preserving a traumatic past. She provided many illuminating examples of the non-native speaker’s associative approach to language, in which apparently playful punning connections reveal deeper truths of an affective response to a suppressed family history. For Petrowskaja, born in Ukraine and growing up with a Russian perspective on the Second World War, writing in German (a language that she learned in her twenties) provided the freedom of otherness and enabled her to develop the concept of a cosmopolitan, universal connectedness, an identity based not on exclusion but on commonality. Her work was shown as another form of resistance, working with dissonances, questioning and probing, often in an almost child-like way, the hidden assumptions and prejudices of language to which native speakers are oblivious.
Dr Anna-Louise Milne (University of London Institute in Paris) continued this theme by speaking about her own writing journey in French, particularly in relation to her work with non-European refugees in Paris. Indeed her emphasis from the start was on ‘writing with’ – exploring the importance of what and whom one writes with, the processes of improvisation and of chiselling and crafting – rather than on the finished text or work of translation as such. She convincingly described how important it is for democracies to foster a sustainable community of languages, and presented a mapping project with the Paris Centre for Migrant Writing and Expression on the historical associations and very different modern resonances of street and place names – another revealing strand of the symposium’s focus on the renewal of literature from the margins.
The afternoon ended with a discussion of possible future directions in the work on translingual writing by contemporary women authors. Suggestions – which will feed into the larger conference envisaged for 2019 – include further exploration of:
• a theoretical base, refining concepts of translingualism, multilingualism, writing with etc.;
• translingual writing and gender;
• the mother tongue: is it a cliché to be tested and resisted or a recourse to a concept of origin and comfort; how does it help to clarify the identities of writers as daughters and mothers?
• translingual writing and the literary market
• translingual desire
• questions of identity and belonging: multiple / hybrid / resisting expectations of identity discourse?
• translingual writing and the concept of authorship: often translingual writing is polyphonic writing; what place does the author (narrator) take?
• resistance: against the monolingual paradigm? the majority / hegemonic (?) society in which the migrant writer lives and writes? patriarchal society?
• the relationship between spoken and written language
• The question of ‘authenticity’; also: how to write accent ?
• distance as a creative element;
• the translatability of translingual writing.
Watch this space! A Call for Papers will be issued shortly.
Margaret May, MRes student, IMLR and Godela Weiss-Sussex, Reader in Modern German Literature